However, I couldn’t be more embarrassed that someone calls themselves a fan of Notre Dame writes an article with such a title. (I can’t even repeat it.) The sad thing is that same line is typically used as yet another genius retort from the Ohio State fans I am constantly barraged with. Please don’t EVER call yourself a Notre Dame fan and write something like that again.

that’s like saying, ‘i didn’t say anything inappropriate other than a personal remark about the obvious fact that he’s a fat ogre.’ oh wait, that is what you said.

” I was more so referring to other people’s comments regarding his appearance that he spoke about.”

that’s like saying, “i’m not really coming up with the headline of my article, your fat and ugly CW, rather i’m repeating what he said everyone else in the world thinks of him. so what’s your point, everyone else is shallow and stupid so it’s ok for you to be? what do the guy’s weight and looks have to do with his job? what does the fact that he’s sensitive about it have to do with job? you’re just looking for an attention grabbing headline. you have nothing of substance to bring to the table–i.e., the fat man makes a lot of money and this is a key year for him to keep his job (wow, i hadn’t read or seen that before a 1000 times). did you bother to research the fact that he was so self conscious about his weight, he had gastric bypass surgery that went wrong and now he’s permanently fat with a limp for the rest of his life because of it. he’s literally disabled and his daughter’s disabled too. and then this fat and ugly guy has the nerve to be upset about personal attacks. jeez that’s so unlike the rest of right? i wish you had your pic up so we could all tell you what you look like genius. and finally, nice job of working in that terminally ill child into your sleazy article with a crappy joke about how he’d do better play calling. you forgot to add that a ‘dead’ child would do better than weis. that’s your idea of a joke? i know a joke when i read one and i read one today

You’re “2)” is legit, an oversight on my part.

I never said anything about Weis’ appearance rather than pointing out that he is infact not very good looking, and rather large. I think I sugarcoated that pretty well. I was more so referring to other people’s comments regarding his appearance that he spoke about.

However, I do find it interesting that you took the time to write a rather long response to an article only to follow it by saying it’s not worth your time.

Anyway, thanks for the correction, and thanks for the response…